![error 10035 sap gui error 10035 sap gui](https://modif-peetz.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Bsp_GUI_740_PA30.jpg)
They're making it to where I can pull some of my games out of my office and into my living room.
#Error 10035 sap gui windows 8#
All of this argument over Windows 8 and Linux on the desktop, etc. I've already got Steam installed, but the catalog is extremely limited. So, I can do the game streaming to my home media server (integrated graphics hooked to my plasma TV so that I can have a monitor for when I need a gui) that's running linux. All of the SteamOS features are also coming to the standard steam client. So I just went back and read the first announcement again. They've got the building blocks for something I'd be very interested in. Personally I've never been impressed with the Steam interface (although Big Picture mode isn't too bad).
#Error 10035 sap gui software#
One that down the road might even be compelling as a desktop, especially combined with their software store. If they integrate the opensource software repositories well with the Steam part of the OS, you might get a very slick and hasslefree experience. Imagine that applied to your entire OS and all software. Steam undoubtedly owes a lot of its success to the ease of installing and updating games.
#Error 10035 sap gui driver#
If they can offer that without the overhead of Windows, and without the hassle of driver updates, they have a market. If you don't see a reason to game on your TV/in your couch, you probably aren't going to see a reason for this.Īt the moment there is one decent 10' ui for gamers on Windows: Steam Big Picture. It mostly makes sense for big screen gaming. If the question is "why do I, the consumer, want this?", the answer seems less clear. This is a sensible answer if the question is "why is Valve doing this?". Making Steam as easily available and as much of a hassle free platform as possible means strengthening the foundation of their success. So as others have said it was an announcement for an upcoming announcement. Everything else was just saying "wait for more". They said there are going to be "steam boxes" which everyone who cares already knew and that there's going to be a beta for it which again is obvious. So the beta device that can go out isn't what is being marketed, but the idea of one.Ĭonsidering almost the entire announcement concerned the beta box it kind of feels like that's what it is marketing.Įdit: Anyways my whole point was that this pretty much wasn't an announcement. I don't see anything about them selling a Steam Machine themselves - it talks about other people making it. That prevents them from showing a render of the hardware that the announcement was focused on because? They're going to use this to prove the UX is acceptable on reference hardware when convincing vendors that they should start selling Steamboxes. Valve isn't going to be making and selling a piece of hardware. The idea is to get the OS in the hands of users with a known hardware profile and make sure everything works as expected. The prototype isn't a finished product prototype, it's a POC box.